IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMP (M) No. 2025 of 2024 Date of decision: 20 . 3 .202 5 Purshotam Ram (deceased) through LRs.…Appellants/non-applicants. Versus Devta Trijugi Narayan Dhar & others. …Respondents/Applicants. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the non-applicants. Mr.Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate, alongwith Mr.Harshit, Advocate. For the Applicants: Mr.Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, alongwith Mr.Udey Kuthiala and Mr.Dhruv Kuthiala, Advocates, vice Ms.Garima Kuthiala, Advocate. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the applicants/respondents submits that as the respondents, for vacation of interim order/protection granted to non- applicants/appellants, are entitled to file Execution Petition or to take appropriate recourse for redressal of their grievance to assert and execute their right in terms of judgment and decree passed in their favour, this application is not pressed. 2. In view of above application is disposed of being not pressed. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes 2025:HHC:6949 CMP (M) No. 2025 of 2024 3. Needless to say applicants/respondents shall have liberty to adopt appropriate course of law for execution of judgment and decree passed by the Court. (Vivek Singh Thakur), 20th March 2025 Judge. (Keshav) 2