KRISHNA NAMTA ALIAS BHONDU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3410/2025 · 2025-05-02
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9569 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9569 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[ 2025:JHHC:13335] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 3410 of 2025
Krishna Namta @ Bhondu aged about 42 years son of Late Shankar Namta resident of New Baradwari, Kumhar Para, Kumhar Para, P.O.- Sakchi, P.S.- Sitaramdera, District- East Singhbhum (Jamshedpur).
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… opp. party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohit Agarwal , Adv. For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl. PP
02 / 02.05.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sitaramdera P.S. Case No.179 of 2024 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2)/ 191(3)/ 329/ 352/ 115(2)/ 109/324(2)/351(2)/303(2) of the B.N.S., 2023
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being member of an unlawful assembly armed with deadly weapons, attempted to murder the members of the informant party. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the allegation of causing grievous injury is not upon the informant, but is against the co-accused Bhodu. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 27.12.2024, as mentioned in para 8 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the victim or the other witness of the case or their family members in any manner during trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-
accused with similar allegations have already been given the privilege of anticipatory bail by this court vide order dated 17.03.2025 passed in ABA No. 1661 of 2025 hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Jamshedpur in connection with Sitaramdera P.S. Case No.179 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case or the victim or their family members in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-