Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9568 (CHH)

MANISH VAIDYA v. Ku. Puja Vaidya

WP227/204/2023 · 2025-06-18

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 204 of 2023 1 - Manish Vaidya S/o Late Manohar Vaidya Aged About 50 Years R/o Sahgal Chwal, Shyam Bhawan, Masanganj, Bilaspur Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Ku. Puja Vaidya D/o Late Prakash Vaidya (Applicant) R/o Near Pani Tanki Sumlu Dhana, Ward No. 21, Thana Mundipura, Tahsil And District Chindwada Madhya Pradesh 2 - Jyoti Vaidya D/o Late Prakash Vaidya (Non Applicant No. 1) R/o Near Pani Tanki Sumlu Dhana, Ward No. 21, Thana Mundipura, Tahsil And District Chindwada Madhya Pradesh 3 - Ku. Saloni Vaidya D/o Late Prakash Vaidya (Non Applicant No. 2) R/o Near Pani Tanki Sumlu Dhana, Ward No. 21, Thana Mundipura, Tahsil And District Chindwada Madhya Pradesh 4 - The Secretary Chhattisgarh State Cooperatrive Marketing Federation Limited Government Of Chhattisgarh Sixth Floor, Tower D, Commercial Complex, C.B.D. Sector-21, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh (Non Applicant No. 4) 5 - Public At Large Non Applicant No. 5 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Adv. For Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Bharat Sharma, Adv. Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.06.19 14:09:42 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 19/06/2025 1) At the very outset, Mr. Sharma submits that the petitioner has challenged that order passed by the learned Second Civil Judge Class–I, Raipur in Succession Case No. 64/2021 whereby application moved by the petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC has been rejected. He contends that final order has already been passed in the succession case and there is remedy available to the petitioner to prefer appeal/revision according to the provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2) At this stage, Mr. Dwivedi seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to law. 3) Permission granted. 4) Consequently, this petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. Certified copy be returned after retaining its xerox copy. Sd/- Rakesh Mohan Pandey JUDGE Ajinkya