S. No. 10 Regular Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 3181/2023 ABDUL RASHID NAJAR …Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. L. A. Latief, Advocate Vs. UT of JK and Others ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Faheem Shah, GA CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL-JUDGE ORDER 16.05.2025 Objections have not been filed. Mr. L. A. Latief, counsel for petitioner, submits that petitioner would be satisfied if his claim for release of increments is considered by respondents. To above suggestion, Mr. Faheem Shah, GA, submits that petitioner’s claim for release of increment shall be considered after examining the case in accordance with applicable rules. In view of submissions made, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to accord consideration to the case of petitioner for release of increments of course in accordance with rules governing the field. The process be completed within a period of two months. While deciding the claim of the petitioner, petitioner may be given opportunity of being heard. Disposed of as above along with connected CM(s). (VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE SRINAGAR 16.05.2025 “Imtiyaz” Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 21.05.2025 10:23