HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13759 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to implead District Basic Education Officer, Bulandshahar, as respondent no.4, in the array of parties, during the course of the day. Heard Mr. Navin Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Hare Ram, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Yatindra, learned counsel for respondent-BSA and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent and perused the records. The instant petition has been filed with a prayer to direct the respondent- authorites to ensure that the petitioners may not be deployed for non- teaching work like revision of voter list as Booth Level Officer (BLO). At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents submits that the controversy involved in the present petition has already been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide its judgement and order dated 11.02.2025 passed in the case of Surya Pratap Singh vs. State of U.P. and others (Writ-A No. 16401 of 2024). In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of Surya Pratap Singh (supra). September 15, 2025 Rahul. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Navin Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Hemlata Sharma And 10 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad