Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
258A
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-330-2023
Date of decision :01.09.2025 POOJA SHARMA ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vipul Sherwal, Asstt.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Rakesh Sobti, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL) The learned State counsel very fairly concedes that FIR No.51 dated 02.02.2022 U/s 204, 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120- B IPC P.S. Ballabgarh does not pertain to the petitioner who is an accused only in FIR No.355 dated 16.10.2022 U/s 409, 120-B IPC and 13 of Prevention of Corruption Act P.S. Sadar Ballabgarh, District Faridabad in which the report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. has not yet been presented. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court once again, if so advised, in case inculpatory report is submitted against the petitioner.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 01.09.2025 JITESH Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No JITESH LAL 2025.09.03 12:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document