HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32363 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. There are certain discrepancies in the writ petition, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. In such view of the fact, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition. October 7, 2025 Sattyarth Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Kumar, Maohammd Nadeem Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Hridaya Narayan Mishra (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Dr. Raj Mohan Saxena .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad