GURJASHAN SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/48128/2025 · 2025-09-01
Vinod S Bhardwaj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95643 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95643 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 121
CRM-M-48128-2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 01.09.2025.
GURJASHAN SINGH AND ANOTHER ... Petitioner(s)
Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ.
PRESENT: Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate, and
Mr. Ankit Rana, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J (ORAL)
The instant petition has been filed for seeking directions to the respondents to take legal action against the private respondent.
At the outset, counsel for the petitioner has failed to refer to any injury which may attract cognizable offences.
Consequently, no such direction as is being sought for by the petitioner can be issued to the respondents.
The present petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the alternative remedies available to him in accordance with law.
September 01, 2025.
(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) raj arora
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable
: Yes/No
RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.09.04 11:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document