Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95635 (PNJ)

ARSHDEEP KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CWP/24976/2023 · 2025-05-12

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 237 Arshdeep Kaur State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. respondents to consider the petitioner Grade-3. 2. of preliminary submissions of and 2, dated 09.01.2024, to state that the petitioner cleared the type test 08.12.2020, however, her 5 ye 05.10.2021 and as such, at that point in time, could not have been considered, while will be made by the department in future, her case would be considered in accordance with applicable rules, the petitioner. 3. 12.05.2025 parveen kumar IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Arshdeep Kaur Versus f Punjab and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Rakesh Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondents to consider the petitioner for promotion to Learned State counsel refers to the averments made in para 5 of preliminary submissions of reply filed on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, dated 09.01.2024, to state that the petitioner cleared the type test 08.12.2020, however, her 5 years’ experience 05.10.2021 and as such, at that point in time, could not have been considered, while in para 7, it is stated that will be made by the department in future, her case would be considered in ce with applicable rules, which satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. Disposed of accordingly. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-24976-2023 (O & M) Date of decision:12.05.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the for promotion to the post of Clerk Learned State counsel refers to the averments made in para 5 reply filed on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, dated 09.01.2024, to state that the petitioner cleared the type test on ars’ experience was completed on 05.10.2021 and as such, at that point in time, could not have been in para 7, it is stated that as and when the promotions will be made by the department in future, her case would be considered in which satisfies the learned counsel for (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.13 09:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.