HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32862 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Heard Shri P.K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondent nos.3 to 6. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice need not be issued to the private respondent no.7, who is real brother of the petitioner. 3. The instant writ petition is preferred seeking following principal reliefs:- "A. Issue a writ, order/direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.4 i.e. District Magistrate, District Kaushambi to take the appropriate action in view of application dated 10.12.2024, whereby the petitioner has made the prayer for initiating a proper inquiry against the culprit persons including the concerned revenue officers, fraudulently who have released the amount of compensation of the petitioner's house/shop constructed at Arazi No.464 area 0.5860 hectare situated at Mauja Mahewa Uparhar, Pargana Atarvan, Tehsil Manjhanpur, District Kaushamnbi in favour of respondent no.7 in illegal and arbitrary manner. B. Issue a writ, order/direction in the nature of mandamus directing the concerned respondent to release the amount of compensation of the petitioner's house/shop constructed at Arazi No.464 area 0.5860 hectare situated at Mauja Mahewa Uparhar, Pargana Atarvan, Tehsil Manjhanpur, District Kaushamnbi in favour of petitioner being an actual owner." 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that so far as the grievance of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pramod Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C. Chhedi Lal .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) petitioner is concerned, he has already filed an application dated 10.12.2024 before the District Magistrate, District Kaushamnbi (respondent no.4) for redressal of his grievance, which is still pending. He has confined his prayer only to the relief that his application dated 10.12.2024 may be considered by the appropriate authority. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the said prayer. 6. No useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending. 7. In view of above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of finally with a direction to the District Magistrate, District Kaushamnbi to decide the petitioner's application in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before him, after affording opportunity of hearing to the private respondent no.7. September 18, 2025 RKP WRIC No. 32862 of 2025 2 (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad