Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11106 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The present petition has been filed challenging the proceedings of suit on the ground that the suit is barred by the res judicata.
3. Petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.
4. In view of the same, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition.
5. With the aforesaid observation, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate application. September 17, 2025 Priya Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Satyendra Rai .....Petitioner(s) Manish Kumar Gupta .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRIYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad