Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95618 (ALL)

RAMDARAS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/32232/2025 · 2025-09-22

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32232 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "(a). issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no.2 to decide the Revision No. C202505000000142 (1614/2025) (Durga Prasad Vs. Ramdaras and others) filed by the respondent no.3 within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that revisional proceedings under Section 333 of U.P. Z.A. and L.R. Act are pending consideration before respondent no. 2 since 2025. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon respondent no. 2 to decide the Revision No. C202505000000142 (1614/2025) (Durga Prasad Vs. Ramdaras and others) , in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 23, 2025 V.S.Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brij Bhushan Prasad Shrivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Ramdaras .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad