MOHHAMAD YUNUS USMANI v. CHAIRMAN NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD
WPMS/2258/2025 · 2025-08-01
Ravindra Maithani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9561 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9561 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 15
WPMS No.2258 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. M.K. Ray and Mr. Harsh Taneja, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Anup Kumar Verma, Advocate for the respondents. Heard. It is the case of the petitioner that he was given a work order by Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Gadarpur, District Udham Singh Nagar, for construction work of drainage system, which he has completed on 05.09.2023, but till date, payment has not been made.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has given a representation to the respondent no.2/ Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Gadarpur, District Udham Singh Nagar, but till date, it has not been decided. The respondent no.2/ Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Gadarpur, District Udham Singh Nagar, may be directed to decide it within a stipulated time, by a reasoned and speaking order.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the representation filed by the petitioner will be decided by the respondents within a period of 2 weeks. The Court takes on record the statement given by learned counsel for the respondents. The writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner within a
period of 2 weeks from today, by a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law. A copy of the order that is to be passed on the representation made by the petitioner shall be provided immediately to the petitioner.
(Ravindra Maithani J.)
01.08.2025 RV