ISHVINDER SHERGIL ALIAS SUNNY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
BA2/209/2025 · 2025-08-13
Rakesh Thapliyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9560 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9560 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:7133 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA2/209/2025
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. Parikshti Saini, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Siddharth Bisht, learned A.G.A. and Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. This is second bail application moved on behalf of the applicant Ishvinder Shergill @ Sunny, S/o R.S. Gill seeking bail in relation to FIR dated 13.12.2024 bearing Case Crime No. 781 of 2024, registered at P.S. Patelnagar District Dehradun wherein the present applicant along with one Vivek Rawat were implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(1) and 61(2) of the BNS 2023 read with Section 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
4. First bail application was converted into short term bail on 04.03.2025.
5. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant was granted short term bail on 04.03.2025 for two months which was extended on 09.05.2025 and further it was extended on 06.06.2025 and thereafter on expiry of short term bail the applicant surrender before the court concerned copy of which is enclosed as Annexure 8. It is further contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that other co-accused was granted regular bail on 11.06.2025 in BA1 No. 766 of 2025. He further submits that applicant has no previous criminal history and in this particular case charge sheet has already been filed, and, as such there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant.
5. On the other side, Mr. Siddharth Bisht, learned A.G.A. for the State has not
2025:UHC:7133 disputed this fact that earlier the applicant was granted short term bail and he never misused the same and now he has surrender and furthermore applicant has no previous criminal history. He further submits that applicant deserves to get benefit of parity since another co-accused Vivek Rawat already granted bail..
6. After hearing the arguments of the
learned counsel for the applicant and further taking into consideration that the co-accused has already been granted bail on 11.06.2025 and furthermore the applicant has no previous criminal history and charge sheet has already been filed, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail.
7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the instant second bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant Ishvinder Shergill @ Sunny, be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
13.08.2025 Parul
2025:UHC:7133