HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 3700 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Mr. Mahendra Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anil Kumar Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. The instant petition has been filed for the following relief:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to record the name of the petitioner in the revenue record over the gata No. 481M, area 0.2530 hectare, gata No. 1090M area 0.2530 hectare, gata No. 1092M area 0.2530 hectare situated in Village Nayagaon Tehsil Sikandrabad, District Bulandshahar in pursuance of the order dated 19.2.1992 passed by Consolidation Officer, Sikandrabad in case No. 178/91 under Section 9Ka (2) Consolidation of Holding Act. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondent no.2 to declare the petitioner tenure holder with transferable right from tenure holder with non-transferable right in pursuance of the order dated 11.2.1991, otherwise the petitioner shall suffer irreparable loss and injury." 3. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that order dated 19.2.1992 passed by Consolidation Officer under Section 9A (2) of U.P.C.H. Act should be given effect in the revenu records. 4. The prayer for writ of mandamus made in the instant petition cannot be allowed in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as the full procedure has been prescribed under U.P.C.H. Act and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Jitendra Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Rules framed thereunder for implementation of the order passed under the U.P.C.H. Act. 5. The writ petition filed by petitioner is misconceived and dismissed accordingly. September 12, 2025 Vandana Y. WRIB No. 3700 of 2025 2 (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad