Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95566 (ALL)

KALPNATH v. RAJENDRA AND 34 OTHERS

A227/11068/2025 · 2025-09-16

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11068 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " Issue a order or direction to direct the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mau, District- Mau to decide the objection dated 15.02.2025 which is pending in Suit no. 385 of 2024 (Rajendra and others Vs. Kalpnath and others), expeditiously preferable within a stipulated time." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the aforesaid objections filed by the defendant/petitioner are pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mau, District- Mau to consider and decide the aforesaid objections, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gokaran Singh, Ram Lakhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : Kalpnath .....Petitioner(s) Rajendra And 34 Others .....Respondent(s) twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 17, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 11068 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad