Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95565 (ALL)

VIKRAMA v. HAUSILA AND 2 OTHERS

A227/10895/2025 · 2025-09-11

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10895 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "Issue order or direction, directing to the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), City, Jaunpur for deciding Civil Suit No.798 of 2008 (Vikrama Vs. Hausila) as early as possible within three months." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the above-mentioned case is pending consideration since 2008, the same has not been decided till date. Learned counsel prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), City Jaunpur to decide the above-mentioned case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Babu Ram Yadav, Raj Kumar Yadav, Salil Krishna Counsel for Respondent(s) : Vikrama .....Petitioner(s) Hausila And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) eighteen months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties as well as giving a reasonable opportunity of leading evidence in respect of their case provided there is no other legal impediment. September 12, 2025 Rishabh A227 No. 10895 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad