Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95550 (MAD)

Samidurai v. State rep by the Inspector of Police

CRL OP/25364/2025 · 2025-09-16

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 25364 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 25364 of 2025 Samidurai Petitioner(s) Vs State rep by the Inspector of Police Sirupakkam police Station, Cuddalore District Cr.no.75/2025 Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in connection with the crime no.75 of 2025, pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Muruganandham K For Respondent(s): Mr. S.Udayakuamar, Government Advocate-Criminal Side https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 25364 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 4(1)(a), 4(1)(i), of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act and 4(1)(A), 4(1)(C), 14(A) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2024, in Crime No.75 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that on 11.06.2025 at about 06.30 hours, while the Inspector of Police along with his police party was conducting a vehicle check up in Mangalur Village, at that juncture the petitioner and another person attempted to sell Tasmack Liquor bottle, and he was found in illegal possession of 150 bottle of Brandy, which were seized by the respondent police from A1. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 25364 of 2025 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent would vehemently oppose stating that the petitioner is a habitual offender against whom there are twenty six previous cases pending. 5.Taking into consideration the nature of offence and the antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 16-09-2025 gbi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 25364 of 2025 To 1.State rep by the Inspector of Police Sirupakkam police Station, Cuddalore District Cr.no.75/2025 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 25364 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR J. gbi CRL OP No. 25364 of 2025 16-09-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis