Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9554 (JHR)

MOST. PANO DEVI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

C.M.P./451/2025 · 2025-07-18

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025: JHHC: 19661 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 451 of 2025 1. Most. Pano Devi, aged about 65 years, W/o Late Muna Munda 2. Most. Pichwa Devi, aged about 53 years, W/o Late Somar Munda 3. Puran Munda, aged about 55 years, S/o Late Banija Munda All resident of village Kodi, P.S. Patratu, P.O. Barkakana, Dist. Ramgarh … … Petitioners -Versus- 1. State of Jharkhand through Deputy Commissonier, P.O. & P.S. Ramgarh, Distt. Ramgar 2. The Deputy Chief Engineer (Const.), East Central Railway, P.O. Barkakana, P.S. Patratu, Dist. Ramgarh 3. Arjun Munda, S/o Late Bigal Munda 4. Jugal Munda, S/o Late Munshi Munda, both residents of village Kodi, P.S. Patratu, P.O. Barkakana, Dist. Ramgarh … … Opp. Parties --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Mitul Kumar, Advocate For the Railway : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Kumar Pawan, Advocate --- 04/18th July 2025 1. Learned counsel for the parties are present. 2. This petition has been filed for restoration of F.A. No. 89/2017 which was dismissed on account of non-removal of defects in terms of order dated 13.02.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that on account of technical reasons, the defects in the writ petition could not be removed. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party has no serious objection to the prayer for restoration. 5. Considering the aforesaid submission, F.A. No. 89/2017 is restored to its original file. 6. Since F.A. No. 89/2017 is of the roster of this Bench, office is directed to place this case on 23.07.2025 under appropriate heading in the supplementary cause list. 7. C.M.P. No. 451 of 2025 is hereby disposed of. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Mukul/-