IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA"- WRIT PETITION NO: 5818 OF 2025 Between: Chethupattu Sayamma, W/o.late Chethipattu Ponna Reddy, R/o. D.No.3-96/6-1-1, Old Renigunta, Tirupati Rural, Yogimallavaram, Tiruchanoor, Chittoor, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Tirupati District at Tirupati. 3. The Joint Collector, Tirupati District at Tirupati. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupati Revenue Division, Tirupati District. 5. The Tahsildar, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of respondents on considering petitioners representation dated 13.01.2025, submitted for correction of erroneously recorded entries by classifying the subject property as AWD (Assesed Waste Dry) lands without giving any prior notice, covered under Survey No.49/10, situated in Daminedu Revenue Village of Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District, which were erroneously recorded by the respondents is illegal, irregular, irrational, amounts to non-discharge of legal obligation conferred on respondents particularly 5 respondent under section 5(3) of Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and P^adar Pass Books Act, 1971 and rules framed there under and violates Articles 14,21 and 300-A of Constitution of India. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents particularly 5*^ respondent to consider and initiate necessary action on petitioner’s representation dated 13.01.2025, submitted for correction of erroneously recorded entries in web land record of rights. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI GOTTI VENU MADHAV CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: ASST.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER th 1 APHC010105442025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] r WEDNESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 5818/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Chethupattu Sayamma, AND ...RESPONDENT(S) State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.G VENU MADHAV CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA ppTiTinN NO: 5818/2025 ORDER: is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution This writ petition is India seeking the following reliefs.- of the “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nZre of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of relpondnfS 1 cons/dering petitioneris representation dated 13 01 2025 submitted for correction of there under and violates Articles 14. 21 and JUU a or Constitution of India and pass such other order. learned counsel for the petitioner Pleader for Revenue for the respondents, made several allegations against the and learned 2. Heard Assistant Government 3. Though the petitioner learned counsel for the petitioner touching the merits of the case, to to consider the representation respondents, during hearing requested this Court, without direction to the respondents dated 13.01.2025 made by the petitioner for rectification of the error issue a occurred in classification of the petitioner's land. Government Pleader for Revenue 4. Learned Assistant fresh representation, the of the same within a submits a submits that if the petitioner will consider and dispose respondents reasonable time. 3 5. In view of the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the The Government of India v. judgment of the Apex Court in P.Venkatesh^ wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. This Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition directing the petitioner to submit a fresh representation, within a period of two(2) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. After receipt of the said representation, the respondents shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders, after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of two(2) months thereafter. 6. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ^2019(8) SCALE 544 Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// N OFFICER S To Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, State of Pradesh Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 1. The Andhra 2. The District Collector, Tirupati District at Tirupati. 3. The Joint Collector, Tirupati District at Tirupati. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupati Revenue Division, Tirupati District. 5. The Tahsildar, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District. 6. One CC to Sri Gotti Venu MadhavChowdary,Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 8. Three CD Copies. TF ' % HIGH COURT DATED:19/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.5818 of 2025 I 01 APR 2C25 B DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS