1 2025:CGHC:14679-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 213 of 2025 Avinash Kumar Jain S/o Late H.G. Jain Aged About 64 Years Presently R/o HOD and In-Charge Principal Government Polytechnic Narayanpur (C.G.) ... Appellant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Technical Education Manpower, Science And Technology Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 – Director, Technical Education, Department Indrawati Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Through Secretary, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Smt. Usha Jain, Principal, Government Polytechnic, Khairagarh, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 5 - Prakash Kumar Pandey, Principal, Govt. Polytechnic, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.) 6 - Kajal Roy Presently Posted As Principal Govt. Polytechnic, Kanker District- Kanker (C.G.) 7 - Dr. Amitabh Dubey Presently Posted As Additional Director Directorate Of Technical Education Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 8 - Smt. Mamta Agrawal Head Of Department, Computer Science Govt. Polytechnic, Durg District - Durg (C.G.) BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2025.03.28 10:41:00 +0530 2 9 - R.J. Pandey Presently Posted As Principal, Govt. Polytechnic, Ambikapur District - Surguja (C.G.) 10 - Ashwani Kumar Khairwar Presently Posted As Principal, Govt. Polytechnic, Kondagaon, District- Kondagaon (C.G.) ... Respondents For Appellant : Mr.Shyam Kumar, Advocate For Respondents No.1 and 2 For Respondent No.3 For Respondents No.7, 9 and 10 : : : Mr.Shashank Thakur, Deputy Advocate General Dr.Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate Mr.Keshav Dewangan, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 27 .03 .2025 1. Heard Mr.Shyam Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr.Shashank Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for respondents No.1 and 2/State, Dr.Sudeep Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 and Mr.Keshav Dewangan, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.7, 9 and 10. 2. The appellant has filed this writ appeal against the order dated 08.01.2025 passed by learned Single Judge in WPS No.3766 of 2015 by which learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the writ petitioner / appellant herein. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that the issue 3 involved in this writ appeal has already been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment dated 17.03.2025 in WA No.180 of 2025 (S.D.Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh and others), whereby this Court observed as under:- “9. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge, we notice that the same has been rendered with cogent and justifiable reasons. In an intra-court appeal, no interference is usually warranted unless palpable infirmities are noticed on a plain reading of the impugned order. In the facts and circumstances of the instant case, on a plain reading of order, we do not notice any such palpable infirmity or perversity, as such, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. 10. Accordingly, the writ appeal being devoid of merit is liable to be and is hereby dismissed. No cost(s).” 4. In view of above, the present writ appeal is also dismissed in terms of the judgment dated 17.03.2025 passed by this Court in WA No.180 of 2025. No cost(s). Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu