PARDEEP SINGH @ PARDEEP BHATTI v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/48637/2025 · 2025-09-10
Surya Partap Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95526 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95526 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-48637
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 116
PARDEEP SINGH @PARDEEP BHATTI STATE OF
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present:
SURYA PRATAP SINGH
1.
directions to petitioner. to respondent No.3 not to interfere in the peaceful life of the petitioner. present petition seeking protection has been petitioner has been that the details of the case, for which he is being summoned, have not been disclosed to him.
2.
48637-2025 (O&M) 8587
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH
PARDEEP SINGH @PARDEEP BHATTI
VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PRATAP SINGH
Mr. Manpreet Singh Sidhu, Advocate SURYA PRATAP SINGH, J (ORAL)
The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the respondents No.1 and 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner. It has also been prayed that further direction may also been issued to respondent No.3 not to interfere in the peaceful life of the petitioner. present petition seeking protection has been petitioner has been arrested by the police in the name of some enquiry, and that the details of the case, for which he is being summoned, have not been disclosed to him.
Notice of motion to the respondents No.1 to 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-48637-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 10.09.2025 PARDEEP SINGH @PARDEEP BHATTI
.....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PRATAP SINGH , Advocate for the petitioner. has been filed by the petitioner 2 to decide the representation of the further direction may also been issued to respondent No.3 not to interfere in the peaceful life of the petitioner. The present petition seeking protection has been filed on the ground that the arrested by the police in the name of some enquiry, and that the details of the case, for which he is being summoned, have not been respondents No.1 to 3 only.
(O&M) 5
.....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS for 2 to decide the representation of the further direction may also been issued The filed on the ground that the arrested by the police in the name of some enquiry, and that the details of the case, for which he is being summoned, have not been GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.11 19:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-48637
4.
present petition for a prayer that representation respondent No.
5.
hereby disposed of with a direction to speaking order and P-3) within a period of 15 days from
order. Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 48637-2025 (O&M) 8587
The learned counsel representing the petitioner has pressed the present petition for a prayer that a direction for disposing of the representation moved by the petitioner respondent No.2 and that the instant writ petition be
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is
disposed of with a direction to speaking order and decide the representation ) within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant
Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2
The learned counsel representing the petitioner has pressed the a direction for disposing of the (Annexure P-3) be given to the instant writ petition be disposed of accordingly Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is
disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to pass a decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure the date of receipt of copy of instant :Yes/No : Yes/No
The learned counsel representing the petitioner has pressed the a direction for disposing of the the accordingly. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is pass a (Annexure the date of receipt of copy of instant GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.11 19:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document