Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95516 (PAT)

Sajan Ray @ Sajan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./65245/2025 · 2025-09-23

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65245 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2025 Thana- SARAI RANJAN District- Samastipur ====================================================== Sajan Ray @ Sajan Kumar S/o Wakil Ray @ Vakil Ray Resident of Village- Vikrampur, P.S.- Halai, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mahendra Pratap, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 23-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a), 41(i), 41(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. 3. The case of the prosecution is that from five vehicles altogether 2752.965 liters of country made foreign liquor was recovered. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is quite innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel has further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. Learned counsel has also submitted that as per the case of the prosecution, the petitioner was not apprehended at Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65245 of 2025(2) dt.23-09-2025 2/2 the place of occurrence rather his name was disclosed by co- villagers and chawkidar. Learned counsel has further stated that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 12.07.2025. 5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail to the petitioner and submitted that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of three cases. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with a condition that the petitioner shall not indulge in similar nature of offences in future. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Sarairanjan P.S. Case No. 103 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise-II, Samastipur. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T