265 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT RAMAN ALIAS RINKU MAHANT HARI DASS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. HARKESH MANUJA By way of present revision petition, challenge to decision dated 26/09/2018 passed by the whereby, eviction of the petitioner was ordered from the demised premises. Learned despite having made all efforts, no one has chosen to instruct update him in Having order was passed against petitioner way back has been no order passed in his favour in the present revision petition. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed. However, in case any petitioner, he being in occupation of demise liberty to seek revival of the present petition. 12.08.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: RAMAN ALIAS RINKU Versus MAHANT HARI DASS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present revision petition, challenge to decision dated 26/09/2018 passed by the by, eviction of the petitioner was ordered from the demised Learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits that despite having made all efforts, no one has chosen to instruct in the present matter. Having perused the record, it is evident that the eviction order was passed against petitioner way back has been no order passed in his favour in the present revision petition. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed. However, in case any cause still survive petitioner, he being in occupation of demise liberty to seek revival of the present petition. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-16409-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 12, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondent HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. By way of present revision petition, challenge has been laid to decision dated 26/09/2018 passed by the Appellate Authority by, eviction of the petitioner was ordered from the demised counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits that despite having made all efforts, no one has chosen to instruct him and the record, it is evident that the eviction order was passed against petitioner way back on 26/09/2018, and there has been no order passed in his favour in the present revision petition. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed. still survives in favour of the petitioner, he being in occupation of demised premises, shall be at liberty to seek revival of the present petition. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No (O&M) August 12, 2025 laid Authority by, eviction of the petitioner was ordered from the demised counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits that him and the record, it is evident that the eviction 26/09/2018, and there the shall be at TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.08.20 06:22 I agree to specified portions of this document