MR. SUMIT CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/31875/2025 · 2025-09-18
Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar J Criminal, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95504 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95504 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31875 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is assailing the order dated August 11, 2025 passed under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
3. Upon hearing learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, we are of the view that since the petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy of filing securitization application before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, we do not find it a fit case to interfere.
4. In light of the above, writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to act in accordance with law. September 19, 2025 Rakesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Mr. Sumit Chaudhary .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH MEHTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad