Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13716 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayers:-
"I. Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of Mandamus, commanding / directing the Respondents to include the petitioner under the Old Pension Scheme and to award/Pay the pension to the Petitioner upon his retirement accordingly. II. Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus, commanding/ directing the respondent authorities to treat the Petitioner to be governed / covered under the Old Pension Scheme and to ensure deduction, payment of contribution towards retiral benefits to the Petitioner accordingly forthwith or within stipulated period or fixed by this Hon'ble Court. III. Issue a writ
order or direction in the nature of mandamus/commanding/directing the respondent to pay the arrears of salary to the petitioner from March 2004 to February 2008 along with suitable interest within stipulated period or fixed by this Hon'ble Court. IV. A writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus, commanding/ directing the respondent authorities to decide the representation moved by the Petitioner dated 10.05.2025 within stipulated period of time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Grijesh Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Vijay Kumar Dubey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri R.P. Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondents, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record.
5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 within 15 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.2, District Inspector of Schools, Deoria is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation.
6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is
disposed of. (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) September 12, 2025 Atul WRIA No. 13716 of 2025 2
Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad