Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9550 (RAJ)

MAYUR KHAN S/O SHRI INAM HUSSAIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3174/2025 · 2025-03-07

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:10568] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3174/2025 Mayur Khan S/o Shri Inam Hussain, R/o Village Dabla, Police Station Dablana, District Bundi (Raj.) (Presently Confined At District Jail Bundi). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3297/2025 Sayyad Ali Son Of Shri Ashraf Ali, R/o Village Alod, Police Station Dablana, District Bundi (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Bundi) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma Mr. Saurabh Jain Mr. Shrawan Gupta for Mr. Nawab Ali Rathore For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 07/03/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.19/2024 registered at Police Station Dablana, District Bundi for the offences under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471, 467 & 472 of IPC. Investigation is being conducted for [2025:RJ-JP:10568] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3174/2025] offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471, 467 & 472/120B of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submit that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. It is submitted that entire offence is based on documents and same are in possession of investigating agency. Learned counsel contends that petitioners have no criminal antecedents and they are in custody since 14.02.2025. Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. Trial will take time in its conclusion. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. She submits that serious offence has been committed by petitioners as they have prepared forged no objection certificate to take the license of meat shop. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, as also considering the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; petitioners have no criminal antecedents and they are in custody since 14.02.2025; trial will take time in its conclusion, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners (1) Mayur Khan S/o Shri Inam Hussain, & (2) Sayyad Ali Son Of Shri Ashraf Ali, shall [2025:RJ-JP:10568] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3174/2025] be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /191-192