Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9550 (PNJ)

BALJEET SINGH v. MONIKA MALIK DIRECTOR -III AND ANOTHER

COCP/9/2025 · 2025-02-03

Harkesh Manuja

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP No.9 of 2025 (O IN TH 211-U BALJEET SING Vs MONIKA MALI CORAM: HON' Present: Mr. Mr. H HARKESH MAN 1. Lear from Smt. Sneh WCD, Haryana su terms of previous terms of the orde 23.01.2025 passe Haryana, Panchku 2. It ha benefits payable t 3. In vi counsel for the pe 4. Dism 5. How period, as per the contempt petition liable to pay a su the petitioner tow listing of revival a February 03, 202 Atik Whe Whe (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No. Date of De SINGH ALIK DIRECTOR -III AND ANOT ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate for the pe Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Addl. A.G., Harya **** MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel representing Sneh Prabha, Assistant, WCD, Hary yana submits that order dated 16.12.20 evious speaking order dated 15.10.20 e order passed by the Writ Court fo passed by the Director, Women & anchkula. It has also been pointed out by lear yable to the petitioner shall be released In view of the aforesaid undertakin the petitioner does not press the presen Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stand However, in case the needful is not er the undertaking, the petitioner wou etition and in that eventuality, the er y a sum of Rs.50,000/- as cost(s) from er towards litigation expenses, imm vival application. (HA , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/N Whether reportable Yes/N UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH P No.9 of 2025 (O&M) of Decision: 03.02.2025 ......Petitioner ANOTHER ....Respondents ESH MANUJA the petitioner. , Haryana. enting the respondents on instruction Haryana and Smt. Arti Singh, ADA .12.2024 (Annexure P-7) was passed .10.2024 which becomes redundant ourt followed by speaking order date en & Child Development Departmen y learned State counsel that necessar leased within 04 weeks from today. ertaking by the respondent(s), learne present petition. stands discharged. is not done within the aforementione er would be at liberty to seek revival o the erring/concerned officer would b s) from his/her own pocket in favour o , immediately i.e. on the first date o (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 1 ructions , ADA, assed in ndant in er dated artment, ecessary learned ioned vival of ould be avour of date of MOHMED ATIK 2025.02.04 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment