Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 8978 of 2024 Court No. - 86 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 2.This Criminal Appeal u/s 14-A(1) of SC/ST Act, has been filed by appellant against the order dated 1.8.2024 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Bhadohi- Gyanpur in Complaintl Case NO. 7 of 2024, (Vidy Sahnkar Vs. Suhail Akbar Ansari and another) under Section 323, 504, 506 IPC and 3 (1) (r) (s) of SC/ST Act, P.S. Bhadohi, District Bhadohi whereby the complaint of the applicant u/s has been dismissed, under Section 203 of Cr.P.C.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant argued that the court below has failed to appreciate facts and law placed before it. It is further submitted that the appellant is complainant in the present case and statements of the complainant as well as his witnesses were recorded under Sections 200/202 Cr.P.C. and they have supported the contents of the complaint. Hence, this Criminal appeal, with above, prayer, for setting aside impugned order and, thereby, directing court below for proceeding in accordance with law.
4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 as well as learned AGA, has vehemently opposed the prayer. It is submitted that court below has rightly dismissed the complaint in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 203 Cr.P.C. As such, court below has neither committed a jurisdictional error in passing the order impugned nor it has exercised it's jurisdiction with material irregularity warranting interference by this Court.
5. I have gone through the the impugned order. The Court below has returned a finding that on the alleged facts and circumstances of the case, no case for summoning the accused is made out.
6. In view of the above, this Criminal appeal, being devoid of merits, deserves to be Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Pankaj Kumar Singh, Vinod Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Ruduvant Pratap Singh, Yogesh Kumar Tiwari Vidya Shankar .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
dismissed and it stands dismissed accordingly. October 13, 2025 A.
CRLA No. 8978 of 2024 2 (Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.) Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad