HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32839 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Shri Vijay Pal, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the instant writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to pursue the remedy before appropriate authority. 2. Shri Fuzail Ahmad Ansari, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents and Shri Dharmendra Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for respondent no.3 – Mathura Vrindavan Development Authority, state that they have no objection to the aforesaid prayer made on behalf of the petitioners. 3. With the aforesaid leave, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. September 18, 2025 NLY Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Pal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dharmendra Singh Chauhan (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Munish Krishna Gautam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad