Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:122845 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 30658 of 2024 Applicant :- Vijay Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vikash Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No 52539/2023 (State Vs Vijay Sharma) arising out of Case Crime no 589/2023 u/s 323, 324, 504, 506 I.P.C, P.S.-Indirapuram, District Ghaziabad pending before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad, on the basis of compromise between the parties. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is husband of opposite party no.2 and on account of matrimonial dispute, instant F.I.R. has been lodged. Now the applicant and opposite party no. 2 have amicably settled the dispute and both are living peacefully. It is next submitted that applicant filed 482 Application No.18495 of 2024 before this Court to quash the proceedings as both the parties have reconciled their differences. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.06.2024 directed the parties to appear before the court below for verification of compromise. 4. Pursuant to the said order, the parties appeared before the court below and in their presence, after due verification of the contents of the compromise made between the parties, the court vide order dated 29.06.2024 has passed the verification report. A copy of the same is annexed as Annexure-6 to the application. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant and opposite party no.2 have settled their matrimonial discord through compromise and as such opposite party no.2 does not wish to press the aforesaid case against the applicant. Opposite party no.2 is ready to withdraw the prosecution of the applicants and in view of the compromise, no fruitful purpose would be served if the prosecution is allowed to go on. 6. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicant and opposite party no. 2 do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them. The matter has been mutually settled between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 7. Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Krishnappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka; 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 529, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and another; 2017 9 SCC 641, B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; 2003(4) SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Burea of Investigation and another; (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 677, Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab; (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another; (2014) Supreme Today 642, the proceedings of Criminal Case No 52539/2023 (State Vs Vijay Sharma) arising out of Case Crime no 589/2023 u/s 323, 324, 504, 506 I.P.C, P.S.-Indirapuram, District Ghaziabad, is hereby quashed. 8. The application under Section 482 CrPC is accordingly allowed. Order Date :- 25.7.2025 Meenu Singh Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad