ARVIND KUMAR S/O OMPRAKASH DHAKA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3143/2025 · 2025-05-21
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9545 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9545 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:21413] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3143/2025 Arvind Kumar S/o Omprakash Dhaka, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Nehra Ki Dhani Tan Gram Kolsiya, Nawalgarh, Police Station Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ( At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Bishnoi Mr. Jawahar Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 21/05/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0369/2024 registered at Police Station-Nawalgarh, District-Jhunjhunu for the offences under Sections 85 and 80(2) of BNS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that as per CCTV footage, neither the petitioner has instigated the deceased to commit suicide nor he has made any demand regarding dowry in fact there is small quarrel between husband and wife and being annoyed of that the victim committed suicide, which is evident from the CCTV footage. There is no previous case registered against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has been filed. The
[2025:RJ-JP:21413] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3143/2025] petitioner is behind the Bar since 21.10.2024. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Arvind Kumar S/o Omprakash Dhaka shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/74