HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7583 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Sri Anjeet Singh, Advocate, has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the informant. The same is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State, and Sri Anjeet Singh, learned counsel for the informant, and perused the material placed on record. 3. This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 159 of 2025, under Sections 109, 351(2), 352 B.N.S. and 27/30 Arms Act, Police Station Lalauli, District Fatehpur. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was not named in the first information report and has been falsely implicated in the instant case. The name of the applicant was subsequently disclosed by the informant in his statement under Section 180 B.N.S.S. In the alleged incident the role of firing has been assigned to co-accused Shivbhola Singh. In the alleged incident no person received any injury. No medical report is available in the case diary. The co-accused Shivbhola Singh and Prakash Singh have been granted protection till the cognizance is taken on the police report, by this Court vide order dated 18.06.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 12309 of 2025, Shivbhola Singh and another v. State of U.P. and others. At this stage there is no credible evidence to link the applicant with the offence. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. The investigation is still pending and the applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above case. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manvendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Veer Pratap Singh Alias Veeru .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 6. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicant, and, in particular, the fact that the applicant was not named in the first information report; the name of the applicant was subsequently disclosed by the informant in his statement under Section 180 B.N.S.S.; in the alleged incident the role of firing has been assigned to co-accused Shivbhola Singh; in the alleged incident no person received any injury; co-accused Shivbhola Singh and Prakash Singh have been granted protection till the cognizance is taken on the police report; and, at this stage there is no substantive evidence to link the applicant with the offence, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. 7. In the event of arrest, the applicant- Veer Pratap Singh @ Veeru involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on anticipatory bail during pendency of trial, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall co-operate with the Investigating Officer during investigation and shall report to the Investigating Officer as and when required for the purpose of conducting investigation. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer. (iii) The applicant shall not leave the country during the currency of trial without prior permission from the concerned trial Court. (iv) The applicant shall surrender his passport, if any, to the concerned Court forthwith. His passport will remain in custody of the concerned Court. (v) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in court. (vi) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on NABAIL No. 7583 of 2025 2 the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge, and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 BNSS. 8. In default of any of the conditions, the court concerned is at liberty to pass appropriate orders for enforcing and compelling the same. 9. The application stands disposed of. September 16, 2025 SKT/- NABAIL No. 7583 of 2025 3 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad