Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9542 (RAJ)

SATVEER S/O MOHAR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3251/2025 · 2025-03-11

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:11385] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3251/2025 Satveer S/o Mohar Singh, R/o Near Devnarayan Mandir Prem Nagar Second Thana Udhyog Nagar Kota. (At Present Confined At Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 11/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.180/2024 registered at Police Station Vigyan Nagar, District Kota City for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. It is submitted that till today, there is no FSL report available on record. It is submitted that other co-accused persons Rafat Ahmad Khan, Ravi Kumar and Lokendra Singh Rajawat have been granted bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Learned counsel contends that petitioner has been acquitted in one case. It is contended that petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest. [2025:RJ-JP:11385] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3251/2025] Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. Trial will take time in its conclusion. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. She submits that five other have been registered against the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; other co-accused persons have been granted bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Satveer S/o Mohar Singh, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. [2025:RJ-JP:11385] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3251/2025] 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /502