Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar J Criminal, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95410 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95410 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31855 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J.
1. Heard Sri Ashish Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Krishna Mohan Asthana, learned counsel for the respondent bank.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent bank submits that the property has already been sold.
3. In light of the same, we are of the view that it is not a fit case to interfere.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty granteed to the petitioner to approach the DRT for redressal of his grievance. September 12, 2025 K.K. Maurya Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Krishna Mohan Asthana (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Yogendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KAMLESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad