IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (122) CR-5860-2025 Date of Decision:-04.09.2025 Palender and Others ……Petitioners Versus Satyavir and Others ……Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL **** Present: Mr. Rakesh Sobti, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Palwal in case titled “Palender vs. Satyavir & Others” (CS No. 730-2024) to decide the pending application dated 01.07.2024 under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC in a time-bound manner. 2. Heard. 3. Considering the limited nature of the relief sought by the petitioner, issuance of notice to the respondents is dispensed with, as the same is likely to further delay the proceedings. 4. In view of the averments made in the petition, the present revision petition stands disposed of, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. The learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Palwal is directed to decide the application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of CPC, filed SHUBHAM 2025.09.05 11:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order on 01.07.2024, as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law. 5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE 04.09.2025 Shubham Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No SHUBHAM 2025.09.05 11:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order