Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95377 (ALL)

FARDEEN v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/31414/2025 · 2025-09-14

Samit Gopal

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31414 of 2025 Court No. - 64 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J. 1. List revised. 2. Heard Sri Rajeev Upadhyay, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State and perused the record. 3. This bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the applicant Fardeen, seeking release on bail in connection with Case Crime No. 60 of 2025, under Sections 69, 115(2), 351(3), 352 BNS, registered at P.S. Railway Road, District Meerut. 4. Learned counsel for State points that as per his instructions apart from one case mentioned in para 21 of the affidavit as his criminal history, the applicant is reported to be involved in nine other case which has not been disclosed and explained and as such para 21 of the affidavit is false and incorrect. He submits that the bail application be dismissed in view of the order/judgement of the Apex Court passed in the cases of Munnesh Vs. State of U.P.: SLP (Crl.) No. 1400 / 2025 and Kaushal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan : 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1473. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant prays that since the criminal history of the applicant has not been disclosed and explained of the other cases, the present bail application under Section 483 BNSS be dismissed as withdrawn as he intends to file a better application with full and complete documents. 6. Prayer is allowed. 7. The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. September 15, 2025 M. ARIF Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajeev Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Samit Gopal,J.) Fardeen .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad