Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95371 (ALL)

M/S MAA BAISHNO BRICK FIELD SEMRA MANAPUR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/32277/2025 · 2025-09-15

Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar J Criminal, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32277 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J. 1. Heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on part of the respondent no.2/District Magistrate, Fatehpur in considering the representation of the petitioner dated September 6, 2025. 3. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent no.2/District Magistrate, Fatehpur should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioners dated September 6, 2025. 4. Accordingly, the respondent no.2/District Magistrate, Fatehpur is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner dated September 6, 2025 within a period of six weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the private respondents. 5. For a period of six weeks or till disposal of representation of the petitioner the recovery certificate shall be kept in abeyance. 6. In light of the same, the writ petition is disposed of. September 16, 2025 Dev Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Phool Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) M/S Maa Baishno Brick Field Semra Manapur .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad