Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9537 (JHR)

ASHISH RAJWAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2271/2025 · 2025-04-09

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:10966] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No. 2271 of 2025 1. Ashish Rajwar, aged about 20 yrs. S/o Baleshwar Rajwar, 2. Ajay Singh @ Ajay Kumar Singh, aged about 21 yrs. S/o Foudar Singh, Both R/o Thakurkulhi, Dhaia, P.O. Nagnagar, P.S. & Dist. Dhanbad. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhijeet Kr. Singh , Adv. For the State : Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey , Addl. PP For the informant : Mr. Gaurav Kumar , Adv. 02 / 09.04.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Dhanbad P.S. Case No. 49/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109/115(2)/126(2)/351/352/61(2) of BNS, 2023. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the informant. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the informant is the convict of Children case no. 19 of 2022 dated 06.06.2023 passed by learned Special Judge, Children Court, Dhanbad and sentenced to life imprisonment with fine but he is on bail. It is next submitted that there is no allegation of any weapon being used by any of the petitioners in the alleged assault of the informant. It is next submitted that the petitioners are ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners undertake not to annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during pendency of the case hence, the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioners shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Dhanbad in connection with Dhanbad P.S. Case No. 49/2025 subject to the condition that the petitioners will not to annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during pendency of the case and will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile phone number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-