Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9537 (CHH)

DINESH DHRUW v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH,

CRMP/320/2021 · 2025-07-03

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:30463-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 320 of 2021 1 - Dinesh Dhruw S/o Bihari Lal Dhruw, Aged About 28 Years R/o Uday Nagar, Behind B.T.I., Uttar Bastar Kanker, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh. 2 - Shivbati Dhruw, W/o Bihari Lal Dhruw, Aged About 46 Years R/o Uday Nagar, Nagar Palika Kanker, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh. 3 - Wittrekha Dhruw D/o Bihari Lal Dhruw, Aged About 29 Years R/o Near B T I Colony, Uday Nagar, Kanker, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh. 4 - Kaminee Netam D/o Shivprasad Netam, Aged About 22 Years R/o Khaspara, Surhi, Kanker, Badal, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh. 5 - Tiharu Ram S/o Charan Singh Aged About 51 Years R/o Keregaon, Ward B, Barkona, Keregaon, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh, Through - Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Superintendent of Police, Uttar Bastar Kanker, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh. 3 - Station House Officer, Police Station - Kanker, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh. ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.07.04 17:35:23 +0530 2 4 - Hiteshwari Chelak, Head Constable In Police Station Kanker, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh. 5 - Smt. Tanuja Dhruw W/o Dinesh Dhruw, Aged About 25 Years R/o Uday Nagar, Kanker, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : None For State : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer For Respondents No.4 & 5 : Mr. Rajendra Patel, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 04.07. 2025 1. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition when the case is called out. 2. Mr. Hariom Rai, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondents No.1 to 3 as well as Mr. Rajendra Patel, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Sunil Sahu, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.4 and 5, are present. 3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following relief(s):- “(1) call for the status report of the investigation carried out of the concerned police in the impugned FIR being crime 43/2021 registered at the Kanker police 3 station. (2) quash the FIR in crime no.43/2021 registered by police station Kanker so far as the petitioners herein are concerned. (3) pass any other order in view of the special facts and circumstances in the present petition, in the interest of justice.” 4. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel appearing for respondents No.4 and 5 jointly submit that the trial is in advanced stage. 5. We have perused the prayers and pleading made in the petition along with the annexures annexed in this case. 6. As none appears on behalf of the petitioners, it appears that they have lost interest in pursuing the present matter. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed on this count alone. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu