HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 1696 of 2024 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. Heard Sri Avinash Tripathi, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Nitin Chandra Mishra, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and learned AGA for the State. Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for respondent no.2 have raised preliminary objection that the present appeal is not maintainable as the impugned judgement has been passed by the Family Court against which appeal lies u/s 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984. At this stage, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this appeal to enable him to file appeal u/s 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984. In view of the above request, present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. September 15, 2025 S.C. Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Amul Kumar Tyagi, Avinash Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Nitin Chandra Mishra (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Ram Prakash .....Appellant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad