Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95336 (MAD)

Geetha Murthy and another v. Meenakshi

OP/367/2024 · 2025-03-26

K Kumaresh Babu

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

O.P.No.367 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26.03.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU O.P.No.367 of 2024 1.Geetha Murthy 2.S.Swamynathan …Petitioners vs. Meenakshi ...Respondent PRAYER: Original Petition filed for Letters of Administration without Will under Section 218 and 278 of Indian Succession Act 1925 read with Order XXV Rule 5 of Original Side Rules, prays that a Letters of Administration to the property and credits of the deceased R.Sambamoorthy, specified in the schedule hereto, to have effect throughout the whole of Union of Inida may be granted in favour of the petitioners, by this Hon'ble Court and thus render justice. For Petitioners : M/s.M.H.Anishia For M/s.P.Raja For Respondent : M/s.Elizabeth Ravi 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.P.No.367 of 2024 ORDER This Original Petition has been filed for issuance of Letters of Administration in respect of the properties of late Late.Mr.R.Sambamoorthy, who died intestate on 05.05.2002. The petitioners and the respondent are the only surviving legal heirs of the testator. The petitioners seeks issuance of Letters of Administration in respect of the properties mentioned in the petition, which is situated within the jurisdiction of this court. 2. The petitioner has been examined as PW1. He has produced computer generated the death certificates of the deceased and Late.Mr.R.Swaminathan the father of the deceased as Ex.P5 and Ex.P3. The photocopy of legal heirship certificate of the deceased Late.Mr.Sambamoorthy compared with the original as Ex.P6. On perusal of the Ex.P6, it clearly shows that the petitioners and the respondent are the only surviving legal heirs of the deceased testator. The Photocopy of the release deed executed by Late.Mrs.Chokkammal in favour of the testator is marked as Ex.P7. The respondent who is also the daughter of the testator has filed her consent affidavit which is marked as Ex.P11. A paper publication has been made and any objections have not been received. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.P.No.367 of 2024 3. The assertions in the petition have been duly proved by adducing oral evidence supported by documents. In these circumstances, the petitioners are entitled to the relief. 4. In view of the above mentioned facts, this Original Petition is ordered and Letters of Administration are granted in favour of the petitioners, in respect of the properties mentioned in the petition of the late.Mr.R.Sambamoorthy. The petitioner is directed to execute a security bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) in the name of the Assistant Registrar (Original Side) of this Court. The petitioners are further directed to file an inventory of assets and statement of accounts within a period of six months and one year, respectively. 26.03.2025 kak Index :Yes/No Petitioner's witness: P.W.1 – Mr.S.Swamynathan 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.P.No.367 of 2024 Documents exhibited by the petitioners: Exhibits Documents Ex.P1 Photocopy of the extract from permanent register of Madras Taluk Office dated 26.03.1931. (Original is produced, compared and returned to the petitioner's counsel) Ex.P2 Computer generated copy of the death certificate of Swaminathan Iyer died on 30.01.1958. Ex.P3 Computer generated copy of the death certificate of R.Swaminathan died on 05.04.1976. Ex.P4 Computer generated copy of the death certificate of S.Rajalaxmi died on 07.01.1980. Ex.P5 Computer generated copy of the death certificate of Sambamoorthy died on 05.05.2002. Ex.P6 Photocopy of the legal heir certificate of Mr.S.Ramamoorthy dated 10.06.2002 (Original is produced, compared and returned to the petitioner's counsel) Ex.P7 Photocopy of the release deed executed by Chokkammal registered as Doc.No.5534/1960 dated 30.12.1960 (Original is produced, compared and returned to the petitioner's counsel) Ex.P8 Computer generated copy of the extract from permanent land register of Taluk Office, Purasawalkam dated 02.09.2016. Ex.P9 Computer generated copy of the property tax receipt dated 08.12.2022. Ex.P10 Affidavit of assets wherein the net value of assets is Rs.2,59,80,000/- Ex.P11 Consent affidavit of the respondent, Mrs.S.Meenakshi Sheshan. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.P.No.367 of 2024 Exhibits Documents Certificate under Section 65 B of Indian Evidence Act is filed for Exs.P2 to P5, P8 and P9. 26.03.2025 kak 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.P.No.367 of 2024 K.KUMARESH BABU, J. kak O.P.No.367 of 2024 26.03.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis