Shyamdeo Khatwe @ Shyamdeo Mandal v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./67479/2025 · 2025-09-23
Prabhat Kumar Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95314 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95314 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67479 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2025 Thana- KHUTAUNA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Shyamdeo Khatwe @ Shyamdeo Mandal son of Late Ravi Khatwe Resident of Village- Parsahi Sirisiya, Ps- Khutauna, Dist- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hriday Narayan Harshit, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 23-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State .
2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 76, 324(4), 303(2), 352, 351(2), 191(2), 191(3) and 190 of the B.N.S. 3 . The prosecution case in brief, is that on 15.03.2025 at 06:00 A.M., all the accused persons including this petitioner and some unknown persons armed with lathi, danda and farsa came at the shop of the informant and looted the shop of the informant. When the son and wife of the informant tried to stop them, they were assaulted by the co-accused persons, namely, Bhogilal Paswan, Ramesh Paswan, Lallu Paswan and Lalit Paswan. The accused persons also snatched a gold chain and Rs. 80,000/- from the pocket of the informant.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67479 of 2025(2) dt.23-09-2025 2/2
4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged. Specific accusation of looting the shop of the informant is against other co-accused persons and there is no specific role attributed against the petitioner. Case and counter case.
5. Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail petition.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, nature of allegation in the FIR and other circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioner, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st, Jhanjharpur, District- Madhubani in connection with Khutauna P.S. Case No. 31 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023.
AjayMishra/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T