Murugesan v. The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/25688/2025 · 2025-09-22
N Sathish Kumar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95311 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95311 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.25688 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22.09.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR Crl.O.P.No. 25688 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.No.17446 of 2025 Murugesan
... Petitioner Vs. The State Rep By:
1. The Inspector of Police, Varanjaram Police Station, Kallakurichi District, Crime No.80 of 2025.
2. M.Manju
... Respondents
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned FIR in Crime No.80 of 2025 on the file of the 1st respondent-Police and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.W.Cleetus For Respondents : Mr.R.Vinoth Raja Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 O R D E R Page Nos.1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.25688 of 2025 This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.80 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 331(4) and 309(4) of BNS, on the file of the 1st respondent- Police.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the first respondent- Police and perused the materials available on record.
3. The allegations in the FIR in Crime No.80 of 2025, clearly indicate that on 03.04.2025 three unknown persons have entered into the house of the second respondent/defacto complainant and snatched a gold thali weighed about 4 ½ sovereigns. As per the prosecution, investigation is going on.
4. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner mainly contended that the petitioner's name has not been found in the FIR and in the original complaint. Only based on the confession given by Panneer Selvam and Shanmugam, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the alleged offences. Page Nos.2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.25688 of 2025
5. At the outset, this Court is of the view that investigation is on and part of such huge crime is unearthed and hence, this Court does not find any merit in the present petition. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 22.09.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No ms To
1. The Inspector of Police, Varanjaram Police Station, Kallakurichi District.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Page Nos.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.25688 of 2025 N. SATHISH KUMAR, J. ms Crl.O.P.No.25688 of 2025 22.09.2025 Page Nos.4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis