IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 216 COCP-4330-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.09.2025 Bhagwan Sarup Sharma …Petitioner V/s Sh. Chander Shekhar Khare and another …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Gaurav Tyagi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Nihar Bala, Advocate for Mr. Harmanjot Singh Gill, Advocate, for the respondents. *** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) CWP-4754-2021 along with another connected petition (CWP- 4114-2021) was withdrawn on 11.09.2023. However, the Division Bench issued the following directions:- “5. In view of the above, the learned counsels for the petitioners do not press the writ petitions. Consequently, they pray for and, are permitted to withdraw the writ petitions. Ordered accordingly. 6. However, the respondents concerned, are directed to most expeditiously create, carve commercial plots over the sites concerned, and are also directed to, in terms of the eligibility of each of the petitioners make allotments of commercial plots to each of them.” 2. Learned counsel representing the respondents submits that a decision in terms of the aforesaid directions shall be taken within a period of four weeks from today. 3. That being so, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no grievance subsists, at this stage. 4. The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application for revival of the instant VIKAS CHANDER 2025.09.18 09.16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-4330-2025 -2- contempt petition, if the needful is not done within the aforesaid time period. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE September 16, 2025 vcgarg Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIKAS CHANDER 2025.09.18 09.16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document