RAMESHWAR SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
NA528/35287/2025 · 2025-09-14
Vikram D Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95307 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95307 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 35287 of 2025 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State.
2. The present application has been filed by applicants for quashing the non-bailable warrant (NBW) order dated 13.08.2025 as well as entire criminal proceeding of summoning order dated 16.11.2019 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur in Case No.6016 of 2019 (State Vs. Rameshwar and others) arising out of Case Crime No.0140 of 2018 under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Dildar Nagar, District Ghazipur, pending before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur and direct that no coercive action shall be taken against applicants during pendency of proceedings.
3. After some argument, learned counsel for the applicants states that he may be permitted to withdraw this application filed under Section 528 BNSS with liberty to file bail application before the court below.
4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants.
5. Under the circumstances, the present application under Section 528 BNSS is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to applicants to approach the court concerned for bail. In order to enable the applicants to approach the court concerned for bail, for a period of 15 days, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. In case, the bail application is Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajan, Subhas Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rameshwar Singh And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
preferred by the applicants before the court concerned, the court concerned shall decide the same expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournment to any party. While considering the bail application of the applicants, the court below shall keep in mind the principles of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2021) 10 SCC 773.
6. The application under Section 528 BNSS is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty and direction. September 15, 2025 D. Tamang NA528 No. 35287 of 2025 2 (Vikram D. Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad