Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010105472025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 5578/2025 Between:
1. SHAIK MOHAMMAD ARIF, S/O. SHAIK MOHAMMAD YOUSUF, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO.44-I7A, PRAKASH NAGAR, KURNOOL, 518004. ...PETITIONER AND
1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, JAISLAMER HOUSE, NEW DELHI. 2. BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION, EAST BLOCK VIII, R.K.PURAM, NEW DELHI. REP. BY ITS DEPUTY DIRECTOR
3. THE FOREIGNERS REGIONAL REGISTRATION OFFICER FRRO, BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION (MHA), NEW DELHI. 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF HOME,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI. 5. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, DGP OFFICE, MANGALAGIRI. 6. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT,
2
KUMOOL. 7. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KURNOOL II TOWN PS, KURNOOL. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in issuing a Look Out Notice against the petitioner even after grant of Anticipatory bail to the petitioner vide Order dated 08.07.2022 in CRL.M.P.No.734/2022 on the file of the Honble VII Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool for it being per se illegal, arbitrary, against law and is in violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19(l)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to recall the Look Out Notice issued against the petitioner and to intimate to the authorities concerned and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to suspend the Look Out Circular issued as against the petitioner and to permit him to travel abroad and to exercise his Fundamental Right, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VMR LEGAL Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. G.ARUN SHOWRI(CENTRAL GOVT.
COUSEL) The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition if fresh cause of action arises. 3
Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty as prayed for. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Date: 26.06.2025 KA
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 5578/2025
Date: 26.06.2025 KA