HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13819 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Virendra Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Sundeep Agarwal, learned counsel for respondent. 2. At this stage, the Court takes note the submissions made by learned counsel for respondent that the reasons that why the petitioner has not fall under the criteria of dependent family member of employee will be communicated to petitioner within two weeks since reasons are not specified with impugned order. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that this writ petition may be disposed of taking note of above submissions, at this stage. 4. In view of above submissions, this writ petition is disposed of that concerned respondent will communicate the petitioner the reasons as to why he does not fall under the criteria of dependent family member of employee within a short and requisite period. September 23, 2025 P. Pandey Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Virendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Sundeep Agarwal (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Awadhesh Chandra Rana .....Petitioner(s) Punjab And Sind Bank And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PUSHPENDRA PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad