Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9527 (UTT)

PRADEEP KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/2256/2025 · 2025-09-04

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:7888 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2256/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate for the respondent. 2. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs: “i. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to restore the property to the petitioner as a share holder of the Company in the form in which it was before demolition; ii. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing not to interfere in the possession of the Company or its share holders over the land in question.” 3. After arguing for a while, Mr. Sudhir Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach appropriate forum for redressal of his grievance. 4. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with aforesaid liberty. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 04.09.2025 Mahinder/ MAHINDER SINGH Digitally signed by MAHINDER SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=da6212e6e78d94ed3134842bc6a8d6ca168979ca7b8c2f031a92d 1a18b08923c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AB77B7C5B240908B392BE84F5CDD4C2AF35DC4626D305 B1BC9EA4BABA43D2B8F, cn=MAHINDER SINGH Date: 2025.09.05 12:57:51 +05'30' 2025:UHC:7888