Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95269 (ALL)

SMT. POONAM v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/32305/2025 · 2025-09-22

Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32305 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Sri Ravi Pratap Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Sri Subhash Chander Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits on instructions that the petitioner is not inclined to press the instant writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed. 2. Sri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents has no objection in case the petition is dismissed, however he submits that even on merit the matter is not cognizable by this Court. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. September 23, 2025 Kirti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Subhash Chander Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Smt. Poonam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad